jiu jitsu movie

“MAKSO” A Work-In-Progress Film from t j brearton on Vimeo.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

species loneliness

“Precisely at the moment when we have overcome the earth and become unearthly in our modes of dwelling, we need to restore our kinship with the animate world. We suffer these days from a new form of collective anxiety: species loneliness. We are disabled creatures dislocated in a wounded landscape. Species loneliness in a wounded landscape moves us to want to restore our relationship with place and others, or to put it another way, modern humanity yearns to re-establish and restore an ecology of shared identity.”

READ THE ARTICLE in the SANTA BARBARA INDEPENDENT

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

lana del rey

It’s okay to be anxious.

I usually don’t speak to pop culture issues, but there is something I just can’t stay quiet about with this whole Lana Del Rey thing.  (And as soon as I type that I’m hearing the voice of “Joe” from Reservoir Dogs saying “Never mind what you normally wouldn’t do.  Just cough up your goddam buck like everyone else.”)

When I hear about “nervousness” or “performance anxiety,” my ears prick up.  In an interview, Lana says “I really wish I could go back to normal.  I’m really a quiet person.  I always have been.  It’s hard when you see a lot of things written about you.  It’s not what I had in mind.”

There is something very vicious, very raw about being in the spotlight.  In a way, it’s sort of like high school – that last bastion of open cruelty and segregation.  Why do we do this?  It’s a historical phenomenon – we place someone on a pedestal and alternately tear at them.  Everything becomes heightened and compounded.  This is fame.

It’s my belief that thoughtful, creative people are inherently averse to this sort of megawatt attention.  I am not surprised that Lana gets anxious before a performance, and that she’s not entirely comfortable in her skin.  Perhaps there are certain types of people who have the kind of narcissism and ego-protection for being in the spotlight.  Some experts say that politicians are of this ilk, and of course there are those actors and performers who seem not only at home in the spotlight, but relish it and can’t get enough.  (In a documentary on Conan O’Brien, the towering redhead talks about how he just doesn’t feel right unless he’s out there on stage, facing an audience.  I happen to shudder at the thought.)

For years, I’ve been working on fiction novels.  It’s an eye-rolling cliché to be an aspiring writer in today’s world of e-books and self-publishing, but, alas, it’s true.  I was a writer before I did anything else creatively.  Of course, I got the film bug and went to film school and worked on indie sets and commercials, and there was a particularly dark and drinky period of my life when I painted, but writing was where I returned when my son was born and I needed a major outlet.  After six novel-length manuscripts and some dubious success with self-publishing, I’m still chipping away at it.

Thing is, in the back of my mind, something gnaws at me.  It’s this idea that the picture of myself as a successful author will never be complete until I embrace the idea that selling books does not happen without the public dimension.  It means possibly reading to a crowd, it means doing signings, perhaps touring.  An author, especially today, has to work to sell his wares.  This is an uncomfortable prospect for me.

I have been sober for three years now.  What culminated in a period when I drank in the shower in the morning and carried a flask of liquor around with me during the day and wound up drunk every night finally came to an end one Christmas season when I hit rock bottom.  Since then, my life has only gotten better, with blessing after blessing bestowed.  Yet, at the same time, the cessation of drinking revealed a hulking presence in its absence – hello monster of Anxiety.

Anxiety, along with its pals Paranoia and Over-stimulation, was a big part of what drove me to drink in the first place.  Something called “allostatic load” began happening to me from a young age.  I had participated in acting and filmmaking as early as high school, and even won some award for drama, but social situations like parties and sports and even family events seemed too much to bear.  Once I discovered drinking, however, my brain said, “Ah, this is the way to deal with all of this.”

And so it goes.

I’ve been working diligently with all of that for these past three years, but I don’t think or expect it to ever really go away, and I’ll be damned if I’m going to medicate it in the socially acceptable way (read as: Xanax).  I accept that not feeling entirely comfortable at big gatherings or thrust into some spotlight or another is okay.  Not only is it okay, but it’s part of who I am.  I am a quiet person.  I like one-on-one interaction, or small groups.  When I write a book, I don’t have the world in mind.  I have a few people, friends and family, and I write to them, and hope they like it.

There is a danger in believing that all of anxiety is somehow wrong or a problem which needs to be fixed.  If Lana Del Rey doesn’t feel comfortable up there in front of everyone, if part of her yearns for the quiet life – she’s not alone, and I don’t think she needs to “fix” anything.  What’s important is the creative world she wants to create.  Having a vision, having that creative urge to realize something that is bubbling up from within, that’s what matters.  Trying to unearth that, to get that out as intact as possible, to honor it, this is what creative types are meant to do.  All of this farrago and scrutiny is not what it ought to be about; popularity is not the fruit of the artist’s labor – how the artist feels about the work and whether or not the vision has been achieved is the measure of fructification.

Part of this, yes, has to do with the feedback from the public.  But, how much public does one need?  Deriving income from creative work is highly possible without global success.  How much money do you need to get from your work?  If you are able to pay your light bill, if you are able to buy groceries from monies earned for intellectual property, then you are a success.  And as far as critical feedback, there is a saying – if three people tell you that you have a tail, you ought to turn around and look to see if you have a tail.  In other words, if three people tell you that your songs are amazing, then that’s all you should really need.

Lana, you’re songs are really outstanding.  And while the videos you created may not be the ultimate expression of your vision, I really like them, too.  I think you’re creating something that’s unique, and powerful, and I hope you continue to go with it.  The work you do has value, and stirs my own creative energy, and is inspiring.  Hopefully you can pay your light bill with it, and find yourself – introverted, quiet, thoughtful, creative – whole and intact after all is said and done.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

the weight of the world

The year my son was born was the year Bush was reelected President.  “Okay,” I said to my son, “let’s talk about epistemology.”  He cooed and dribbled back at me.  “To understand how people come to know things,” I said, “is to understand how culture works.”

As he gnawed on a chubby fist, I explained to my infant boy about how, since the signing of the Declaration of Independence, its meaning had been skewed into one of entitlement.  People are supposed to have the right to pursue happiness, but nowhere in there does it say “at any cost.”  Wealthy white landowners not wanting to pay their taxes notwithstanding, the group of rebel artisans who crafted the fabled document knew what it was to receive the butt-end of overlordsmanship.  Ultimate power corrupts, ultimately.  So, very likely it was tacit within the Declaration that the pursuit of happiness was to be counterweighted with responsibility and sustainability.

My son nodded at me.  Or perhaps he was falling asleep.

I wondered to him, could we ever go back to a time at the dawn of the industrial revolution and explain the need for sustainability to people?  Likely it would have come across to them as “socialist” or a concept at least an impediment to progress, and, therefore, un-American.  Already, the hook had been likely set.  Conflating with our growth was the idea that anything which suggested we take measure of the future ramifications for our actions, or the strain they imposed on the earth, was to countermand the essential birthright of an American, which was unbridled progress.  The pursuit of happiness — with no exceptions.

Quite possibly, progress is in our nature.  At no time can we seriously imagine inserting ourselves into history and saying to our predecessor, “Hey, stop.  Let’s think about this.  Can we do this with an eye towards the future?  Put that wheel down – don’t discover that fire.  Don’t pave to road or try and make a better life for your family.”  Of course we couldn’t.  Nature is red and tooth and claw and survival is man’s first instinct.  The bar for survival is constantly raised, the essence of it always changing.  We are still at its mercy, trying to climb atop the heap of the world or carve out a space for ourselves in it.  So it’s not a matter of eradicating something so innate within us – this striving for bettering our lives – but to temper it with responsibility.

Is growth at odds with sustainability?  Are they mutually exclusive concepts?  How do you progress – make something better, or get more of it – and keep it sustainable at the same time?

“This is what you’re tasked with,” I told my son, who was definitely asleep now, “reconciling human nature with the finite resources of the earth and the necessity of maintaining them.”

No small task, indeed.  Soon after our discussion, he farted.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

shiny gold star

I didn’t post anything all week.  I guess I didn’t have anything to say.  Plus, my kid was home with a fever, his skin color waning like the blood in his body had been swapped for 1% milk.  A buddy of mine, though, sums it all up.  Life, art, criticism, inspiration.  Thanks, old bone.

***

I have an embarrassing admission to make. Sometimes… no, often, when shopping for books, if it’s between two works from the same author and one was recognized with an award, I’ll take the more recognized work. Simply because other people have recognized it as being of quality make. Those labels, those damned shiny stars, they draw my eye like a lure does a fish. I also read ratings for movies. On Netflix I will let the star rating affect my choices. Not always, but often. When it comes to be a consumer, purchasing “stuff”, I do the same. I researched my wife’s coffee maker and read peoples’ rating and feedback.

So that’s nothing new. I’m one of the crowd. Back before all of this star rating and immediate access to judgments of all kinds and orders I used to pay attention to the recommendations of employees at certain video rental stores. I figured out who watched the good movies and then grab their recommendations off the shelf. Again, probably nothing too extraordinary here.

I guess what I’m getting at in a rather roundabout way is… I think this has a lot to do with the ocean of noise.

Sure there are always those Nietzschian screamers — the squeaky, or rather, exploding wheels. The people who tear their mouths open and scream until their own sound reaches above the din. And maybe they get noticed.

The gimmicky and niche-based works will continue to provide us with just enough novelty to get us through until something profound comes along.

I don’t know. I guess we’ll continue to have critics. We want them. We need them. Because we trust in the labels, the shiny stickers and awards, at least enough to purchase the products. But even more so we’ll continue to judge each other. Because that’s what we want. It’s something that comes natural to us. We want people to know our opinions, because they are so personal to us. And we’ll continue to listen to other peoples’ opinions of us and our works because… well, they’re fucking listening, at least a little bit.

It sounds like you’re reaching for what comes next. I don’t know. I can’t see around that corner. A lot of stuff is changing drastically pretty quickly these days, but I find it hard to think of another paradigm for critical analysis of art, especially when we have just finally gotten people to feel connected to a piece of art through critiquing and being heard. It seems like people will ride this out for as long as possible. There is a certain vanity in having your opinion heard and then taken. We all love it, especially when someone else loves it, and then someone else loves it, and then…

The question remains… how to be heard above the din. There is a lot of fucking noise going on out there. It can feel overwhelming.. all those people… all that art…

The competition is fierce.

I find myself in the camp of the Old School. Persistent pushing.

I may be naive. I may be out of sync, out of date. But I find that a lot of old shit still works. You just have to keep it tuned up.

-Geoff Pierce
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

get your vaccination

vaccine  (ˈvæksiːn)

n

1.

a suspension of dead, attenuated, or otherwise modified microorganisms (viruses, bacteria, or rickettsiae) for inoculation to produce immunity to a disease by stimulating the production of antibodies

Vaccine is the first book in a series which portrays the collapse of civilization in the Adirondacks.

For many years, our susceptibility to viruses has generated fear that a pandemic Superflu could devastate life as we know it.  Controversial precautions, like vaccines, exist to insure our safety and survival.  But what if there was another purpose?  What if the corporation which makes the drug meant to protect us let their fiscal imperative take them too far?  What if, even more than a drive for money, forces at work conspired to reshape our lives into something else?

In this chilling first novel set in the North Country a group of strangers confront these possibilities.  After a retired Special Operative turns up dead, several law enforcement officials and ordinary citizens find themselves connected to each other as a flu virus called “RyLi” infects the region and their fates begin to unfold.

At first mere pawns in a deadly game, our heroes decide to take matters into their own hands, and begin to uncover the truth behind the vaccine…

*

Vaccine will be available in paperback to pre-order via PayPal beginning January 20th for a reduced price.  Upon release in March, the book will be in paperback and on Kindle and cost will revert to standard market bid.  All books are sold through the author.

*

“This is the book to end all End Times books…”

- Anonymous person I made up

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

the girl with the dragon tattoo

Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
Dir: David Fincher
Wr: Steven Zallian, from the book by Steig Larson
Release Date: December 21, 2011
RT: 158 mins

David Fincher is unmatched as a director.  Helming The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo will surely garner him the awards and the recognition for a unique and visionary body of work.

Okay, enough of that shit.  Dragon Tattoo is a badass movie.  And the eponymous “girl with” is truly our best antihero yet – and she wears the t-shirt to prove it.

My jaw was hanging for scenes during the film which do what filmmaker marvels like Fincher are capable of doing – wielding those master strokes.  It’s a bit sad when this is the first movie of the year I’ve felt my cold, dead movie-going corpse stirred into action.  Previous years saw the best fare packed into the last month or two of the year – this is nothing new.  That Dragon Tattoo is one of a drastically shrinking tribe of noteworthy American movies, though, is a subject for another time.

We start the film with where Fincher started out in his career – with a brutally gorgeous music video.  The opening title sequence is a feast for senses.  The soundtrack kicks sonic ass and the smooth, sexy, dangerous images roll out and pour over you, the black ink Fincher is about to paint with raw and shining.

Then we are dropped right into it.  You mentally prepare yourself for two hours and forty minutes of people talking and figuring things out.  Fincher likes these stories.  He likes the complex.  After cutting his directorial teeth on music videos, he was hired to do Alien 3, which launched not only what would become his signature aesthetic (drab color sets, sepia hues and an almost Spartan  spatiality blended with a kind of 60s Polaroid) but a sense of taking the potentially tedious and making it thrilling.  How do you sell a story about two women trapped in a room for two hours?  With Panic Room Fincher’s camera lives inside the enormous apartment it inhabits like a spirit, roaming through solid objects, dropping three flights through the floors which separate them.  Se7en still stands as one of the best crime thrillers ever made (it’s always raining) and both Zodiac and The Social Network are examples of taking an intricate story with a plethora of details and fitting those into a style of shooting, editing, and scoring which serves them to the utmost.

Dragon Tattoo is a rock star film.  Those magic moments burn like hot needles.  I mean, the girl chases down the dude with the bashed jaw on her frikkin motorcycle through the wintry night like a fireball vigilante.

Stieg Larsson’s tattooed heroine “Lisbeth” is the answer to every femme fatale who’s emerged since the 80s and 90s and has been as two-dimensional as the supporting or secondary characters the female actors were relegated to before then.  This is no sword-wielding, one-liner-spouting uberchick in a skin tight diving suit here.  Lisbeth is dimensional, somehow there and yet not there, as real as the person sitting next to you in the theatre and yet larger than life.  She is vulnerable, tough as nails, quiet as ink draining down a well.

There was giggling going on in that theatre during some of those silences, I have to say.  Tittering from some of the anonymous in the low dark.  No doubt quite a few viewers were tickled to see the book which had lived in their minds come to life on screen, no doubt they were happy to have the insider info, so much that they had to squeak a little bit trying to contain their foresight.

I didn’t read the book.  I’m glad not to have.  The story was fresh and unpredictable.  I’m sure I would have enjoyed it either way, but the pleasure, I really felt, was all mine.  And I didn’t need to laugh.

I didn’t laugh when the old man, Henrik, offers Mikael the job, and talks about the sordid, unsavory, corrupt group of people called his family.  Nor when, meanwhile, Lisbeth is being taken advantage of by her case worker, equally deranged and corrupt.  Not even when she reverses the situation on him with the most satisfying kind of revenge was I laughing, no.  My eyes were wide, my breathing shallow; I took it in.

Fincher got to play.  I mean, he really got to play.  I remember reading somewhere hearing the 50 year-old saying that he has a dark side he’s only begun to tap.  The unflinching way in which he portrays some of Larsson’s macabre scenes are Fincher with full command of both his craft and his demons.  When the moments hit, they are sudden, like an assault in the night.  They are immediate; nothing is telegraphed, nothing is gratuitously drawn out.  You can feel the man behind the scenes making these excellent choices, knowing all too well where just another who-done-it has gone before, and making the better decision.  It’s a pleasure to watch because you are being respected.  To both Larsson and Fincher’s credit, in Dragon Tattoo, people act like people.  When they are hurt, often they are scared.  They may run.  When they don’t get what they want, they get pissed.

Again, a shame that this is all there is really to talk about after an entire year of cinema.  Oh, sure, there were a couple flicks which stood out, here and there, but this was the one.  And it’s not like Dragon Tattoo is in the most unblemished company – the top ten grossing films of 2011 were all sequels, and Dragon Tattoo, as we all know, is adapted material, it’s a remake, and it’s one of at least two more to come in the franchise, so we’re talking about another bandwagon movie.

Maybe that’s why this first story ends as suddenly as it begins.  Maybe that’s why Fincher took the project on – seeing it as a chance to keep flexing these toned muscles and stay living in the smoky, olive-drab atmosphere his characters inhabit as long as he can.  Or, maybe this is Fincher’s only contribution to what will undoubtedly be another juggernaut, another gravy train.  Who knows.  Who cares. The movie is brilliant.  And the girl with the dragon tattoo likely wouldn’t give a shit one way or the other.

Posted in art, books, movies | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

manipulation of a star

*

*

*

*

*
Original painting is water color and ink on canvas.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

top 5 holiday movies…with explosions

Once upon a time, It’s a Wonderful Life and Miracle on 34th Street reigned supreme as the movie staples for that snowy, jingly, pine-needly time of year.  They heralded and endorsed the Holiday Season in the way only Hollywood can.

That time is no more.  While a stammering Jimmy Stewart and that adorable little girl on 34th Street will live forever in our hearts, it’s time for them to move over on the holiday-viewing shelf to make room for a new crop of classics…

With explosions.

READ THE ARTICLE

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

seven

My son brings home a cookie he made at school that looks like it fell off a truck.  It’s supposed to be for Christmas, I think, because the white frosting and red sprinkles have glommed together in a way that should have a police line cordoning off the area.

One morning before school, my son entertains himself with a stray puff of goose down.  He realizes the goose down can ride the wind of one of our electric heat throwers, and so he carefully ministers to its flight, running around it and blowing on it to keep it afloat on the hot air current.  He has incredible insights and questions, the kind of halting questions you wouldn’t even think to ask.  “When was the first math problem?”  That’s a good question – the dawn of math.  He’s always wondering what the first of something was, when it began, concerned with origins.  Math is difficult; his old man failed Calculus twice and dropped out in the third round, so it’s not hugely surprising the kid is already getting frustrated over subtraction.

His reading and writing skills are stellar.  His interests vary from day to day, but he’s enthusiastic about everything.  About buying everything, for one thing – he shops in catalogs on the living room floor, lying on his stomach, his feet sticking up.  He wants to play the drums, he wants to be an X-ray doctor, he wants to throw clay pots.  Seven is a truly special age.  Contained in seven is the innocence and enthusiasm of early childhood.  He is just a little boy, bright and full of energy, completely forgiving and almost always in the moment, yet he is becoming a young person, and worries about things he didn’t before.  He can turn the tables on his parents, he can sense what he does not have, and his traits are forming more distinctly.  It’s the dawn of reason, so they say, and it will likely take many years from now before he learns to look beyond reason and acquire faith, though in some ways, he already has it.

Posted in jude, the kid | Leave a comment